CompanySolutionsCustomersFaqNewsContact UsHome
   

 

 

PHOTOPOLYMERIZATION

A. Photoinitiated Free Radical Polymerization................top

When polymerizations are initiated by light and both the initiating species and the growing chain ends are radicals, we speak of radical photopolymerization. In far the most cases of photoinduced polymerization, initiators are used to generate radicals.  One has to distinguish between two different types of photoinitiators.See animation of the photopolymerization of the different type monomers. Photopolymerization of monofunctional monomersPhotopolymerization of bifunctional monomers

 

Type I Photoinitiators: Unimolecular Photoinitiators.  These substances undergo an homolytic bond cleavage upon absorption of light. Benzoin and its derivatives are the most widely used photoinitiators for radical polymerization of vinyl monomers.

 

Type II Photoinitiators Bimolecular Photoinitiators. These photoiniating systems consist of a photoinitiator such as benzophenone or thioxanthone and a coinitiator such as alcohol or amine. Radicals are generated in a bimolecular process by the reduction of photoexcited aromatic carbonyl compound by hydrogen abstraction or electron transfer reactions

B. Photoinitiated Cationic Polymerization................top

Direct Acting Systems

Upon photolysis, these thermally and hygroscopically stable initiators undergo irreversible photofragmentation to produce cation radicals and Brønsted acids. Reactive species thus produced photochemically with onium salts initiate the cationic polymerization of suitable monomers as illustrated below.

 Indirect Acting Systems

For practical applications, onium salts should absorb light appreciably at wavelengths longer than 350 nm where the commercially available medium and high-pressure mercury lamps emit much of their radiation. The indirect actions of these systems, which extend their spectral sensitivity to longer wavelengths, are shown in Figure 1.

Several indirect ways to expand wavelength range have been described. All of these pathways involve (i) electron transfer reactions either with photoexcited sensitizer or free radicals (iii) and with the electron donor compounds in the excited charge transfer complexes (ii)

(i)  Photosensitizer

 Many aromatic hydrocarbons such as anthracene, phenothiazine, and perylene are able to sensitize the decomposition of onium salts via electron transfer. The irradiation of the sensitizer is followed by the formation of a complex between excited sensitizer molecules and ground state onium salt. In this complex, one electron is transferred from the sensitizer to the onium salt giving rise to the generation of sensitizer radical cation as a result of homolytic cleavage of the corresponding onium salt. The radical cations themselves initiate the polymerization of appropriate monomers or, alternatively, interact with hydrogen donor constituents of the polymerization mixture (such as solvent or monomer) resulting in the release of Brønsted acid.

(ii) Charge Transfer Complex

Pyridinium salts are capable of forming charge transfer (CT) complexes with electron rich donors such as methyl- and methoxy-substituted benzene. It was found that the CT complexes formed between pyridinium salts and aromatic electron donors act as photoinitiators for the cationic polymerization of cyclohexene oxide and 4-vinyl cyclohexene oxide. The mechanism illustrated in equations 19 and 20 for the initiation of the cationic polymerization has been suggested.

(iii) Free Radical Promoted Cationic Polymerization

Among the indirectly acting initiating systems, free radical promoted cationic polymerization is the most flexible route, since free radical photoinitiators with a wide range of absorption characteristics are available. Many photochemically formed radicals can be oxidized by onium salts. The cations thus generated are used as initiating species for cationic polymerization according to the following reactions.

 

TRANSFORMATIONS REACTIONS................top

The synthesis of block copolymers between structurally different polymers i.e. condensation and vinyl polymers, by a single polymerization method is rather difficult due to the nature of the respective polymerization mechanisms. Furthermore, utilization of a single method often excludes monomers that polymerize by other mechanisms. In order to extend the range of monomers for synthesis of block copolymers, transformation approach was postulated by which the polymerization mechanism could be changed from one to another which is suitable for the respective monomers. Transformation reactions are classified on the basis of interconversion between propagation mechanisms. It can be seen that between the main living and controlled/living polymerization methods, transformations are accessible in both directions.

 

Image
 

LIQUD CRYSTALLINE POLYMERS................top

In the last few years incorporations of a side-group liquid crystalline (LC) polymer with another non-LC polymer into various forms of LC AB-type block copolymers have made it possible to access a new wide range of structure and property combinations. Comparatively, very little attention has been devoted to LC AB-type graft copolymers. LC block and graft copolymers are especially interesting because of the appearance of two ordering principles at the same time. In fact, copolymers consisting of amorphous polymer blocks and side-group LC polymer blocks present a structurally rich environment in which morphology can affect the LC alignment and phase behavior. The microphase separation of the different blocks may lead to diverse morphologies in these types of polymers. In addition, the orientation ability of mesogens with mechanical and electric fields combined with the mechanical properties of block copolymers may lead to applications such as in electro-optic free standing thin films, mechano-optic materials, and piezoelectric elastomers.

 

CONDUCTING POLYMERS................top

Electrically conducting polymers have received growing interest because of their wide range applications in the areas such as rechargeable batteries, membranes, optical displays, and electro chromic devices. These materials are often termed as synthetic metals due to the fact that they combine chemical and mechanical properties of the polymers with the electronic properties of the metals and semicunductors. Polythiophene is one of the polymers among a general type of conducting polymers that include polyacetylenes, polypyrrole, polyanilines, polyphenylenes, polycarbazoles, polyquinolines, and polyphtalocyanines.

Macromonomers are usually referred to reactive oligomers or polymers in which a polymerizable functional group is incorporated to the chain end(s). Macromonomers can conveniently be copolymerized with conventional monomers to yield graft copolymers with well defined structures. Structure of the polymer chain of the macromonomer affects the properties of the graft copolymer while the end group controls the reactivity in polymerization. Macromonomers possessing one or two electroactive groups at the chain end(s) are usually prepared by using functional initators or by end capping the living growing chains.

In this research, reactive intermediates based on monomeric and polymeric structures with thiophene moieties were synthesized and possibility of their use in electropolymerization through thiophene groups was attempted.
 

BLOCK and GRAFT COPOLYMERIZATION................top

Block and graft copolymers are the most demanded advanced materials because of their diverse copolymer structures. In most cases, the corresponding homopolymers do not form homogeneous phase. However, linear arrangement of the blocks by chemical bonds results in the realization of a stable structure with two phases separated. Each segment exerts its character or function to the bulk of the copolymers. This way various properties are improved or combined to give possibility of using block copolymers as compatabilizers, impact modifiers, surface modifiers, coating materials, antistatic agents and adhesives.

 

Block Copolymers

According to the most common methodology, monomer A is polymerized completely, after which, monomer B is introduced in the mixture and its polymerization proceeds upon initiation by the active site of the first block. This approach is referred to as sequential monomer addition in controlled/living polymerization methods. For obtaining a well-defined block copolymer, the living site of the first monomer must be effective in initiating the polymerization of the second monomer, that is, simultaneous initiation of all growing B chains must be ensured and the rate of the crossover reaction must be higher than the rate of propagation of monomer B.

Another route involves the use of a difunctional initiator and has been employed in the preparation of ABA symmetric triblock copolymers. In this methodology, a compound possessing two initiating sites is utilized in the formation of the middle block first, followed by the polymerization of the second monomer to synthesize the first and the third blocks. This allows the preparation of the ABA blocks in two, instead of three steps without fractionation or other purification steps.  The difunctional initiator must be chosen so as to initiate the polymerization with the same rate from either direction.

 

Moreover, AB diblock or ABA triblock copolymers can be prepared by coupling two appropriately end-functionalized chains of A and B homopolymers or AB blocks, respectively. In the latter case, block B should initially contain half the molecular weight of the final desired block B. The efficiency of coupling will be high if the reaction is rapid and the living diblock copolymer is used in excess.

Graft Copolymers

Graft copolymers can be obtained with three general methods: (i) grafting-onto, in which side chains are preformed, and then attached to the backbone; (ii) grafting-from, in which the monomer is grafted from the backbone; and (iii) grafting-through, in which the macromonomers are copolymerized.

Grafting onto methods involve reaction of functional groups (Y) located at the chain ends of one kind of polymer with another functional groups (X) which distributed randomly on the main chain of the other polymer

Chemical initiation has also been used in grafting from method. In this case, a polymer backbone made that contains some thermally cleavable bonds such as azo and peroxide linkages (See below). If the polymers are heated in the presence of a second monomer, initiation takes places. In such systems, homopolymer formation is unavoidable because of the concomitant formation of low molar mass radicals.

Macromonomers are short polymer chains possessing a polymerizable group at the one termini. A great variety of methods involving living polymerization techniques, chain transfer reactions and end chain modifications, have been developed to synthesize such species.

CONTROLLED POLYMERIZATION METHODS................top

 Recent developments in controlled/living radical polymerization provided possibility to synthesize well-defined telechelic polymers with controlled functionality also with radical routes. As it will be shown below, all the three standard methods for controlled/living radical polymerization, namely, Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP), Stable Free Radical Mediated Polymerization (SFRP), also called as Nitroxide Mediated Polymerization (NMP), and Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Polymerization (RAFT)  were used for the preparation of telechelic polymers. 

(i) Nitroxide Mediated Polymerization

 In NMP systems, stable free radicals, such as nitroxides, are used as reversible terminating agents to control the polymerization process. Dormant chains are generated by reversible deactivation of the growing chains through covalent bond formation. At high temperatures, the bond undergoes a homolytic cleavage to produce the active growing chain and the nitroxide radical. Activation is followed by a rapid deactivation, whereby a few monomer units are incorporated to the propagating chain. See animation of the  NMP

(ii) Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization

Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization, pioneered by Matyjaszewski and Sawamoto, is based on a continuous and reversible halogen transfer (pseudo halogen) between a dormant propagating species, Pn, and a transition-metal (eg. Cu), complexed by a ligand (eg. bipy), in its lower oxidation state (Scheme 6). Halogen transfer is accompanied by a one-electron oxidation of the transition metal, whereby propagation takes place by the addition of monomers to the activated chains. Homogeneity of the polymeric chains is controlled by the fast and simultaneous initiation as well as rapid deactivation of the growing chains. Here, the rate of deactivation should be faster than the propagation rate for an effective control. Low concentration of the active centers, maintained by deactivation, suppresses termination and chain transfer reactions at later stages. See animation of the ATRP

 

 Reverse ATRP differs from ATRP in its initiation process, where a conventional radical initiator, such as AIBN (2,2’-Azobisisobutyronitrile), is used. As shown below, in the initiation step, once generated, the initiating radicals or the propagating radicals, I. Or I-P., can abstract the halogen atom X from the oxidized transition-metal species, XMtn+1, to form the reduced transition-metal species, Mtn, and the dormant species, I-X or I-P1-X. In the subsequent steps, the transition-metal species, Mtn, promotes exactly the same ATRP process as normal ATRP where R-X/Mtn/Lx are used as the initiation system. Instead of first activation of a dormant species, R-X, with Mtn, as in the case of normal ATRP, reverse ATRP originates from the deactivation reaction between radicals, I. or I-P., and XMtn+1. See animation of the RATRP

 (iii) Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Polymerization

Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Polymerization (RAFT), developed by Rizzardo and co-workers in the late 1990s, utilizes a chain-transfer- active thiocarbonylthio moiety for the exchange between active and dormant chains. The mechanism is illustrated in below.

The active species, such as the radicals stemming from the decomposition of the initiator and propagating radicals (Pn.), are transferred to the RAFT-agents, e.g. the thiocarbonylthio moiety. Meanwhile, an intermediate radical is formed, and undergoes a fast fragmentation reaction, giving a polymeric RAFT agent and a new radical.  The radical reinitiates the polymerization. The equilibrium is established by successive chain transfer-fragmentation stages. Z and R groups in the thiocarbonylthio compound represent the activating group and homolytically leaving group, respectively. These, in turn, determine the rates of addition and fragmentation. As a matter of fact, the choice of RAFT agent for a specified monomer is rather significant and affects the degree of control. See animation of the RAFT

 

NANOCOMPOSITES................top

SYNTHESIS OF POLYMER/METAL NANOCOMPOSITES

Nanocomposite materials containing metal nanoparticles and polymer matrix may exhibit novel physical and chemical properties that are of high scientific and technological importance. These materials combine the physical properties of small size metal nanoparticles with those of polymeric materials in a beneficial manner. Many advanced optoelectronic and sensor devices are based on the fabrication of these materials. Because of their high surface free energy, nanoparticles tend to agglomerate. A key challenge for a potential technological use is the achievement of homogeneous dispersion of the thermodynamically unstable nanoparticles. Various methods have been applied. Generally applied methodology is detaining nanoparticles during the preparation by adding protecting agents or setting them in an inert environment. Among them, photochemical methods involving light induced reduction of metal ions such as Ag and Au complexes are of particular interest as they find a wide range of application including synthesis of metallic colloids, and metallization and patterning of films.

 Recently, we have introduced a novel approach for the preparation of metal-polymer nanocomposites, in which nanoparticle formation and UV crosslinking process were accomplished in one pot by simply irradiating appropriate formulations, obtaining the homogeneous distribution of the nanoparticles within the polymer network without any macroscopic agglomeration. Silver or gold nanoparticles and initiaing species were formed in a single redox process.

POLYMER/CLAY NANOCOMPOSITES

The use of nanostructured fillers in the polymer has gained significant importance in the development of thermosetting composites. One of the more widely studied nanocomposite strategies is the incorporation of layered silicates into the polymer matrix. In comparison to other nanoparticles, layered silicates belong to a unique group of nanofillers with only one dimension on the nanometer scale. The individual platelets of this filler are slightly below 1 nm in thickness, and the diameter of the platelets varies between 200 and 600 nm.
Three methods have been developed over time for the synthesis of polymer/clay nanocomposites: solution exfoliation, melt intercalation and in situ intercalative polymerization. However, the most common process to synthesize polyether/clay layered silicate nanocomposites is via the in-situ polymerization, the monomer, together with the initiator and/or catalyst, is intercalated within the silicate layers and the polymerization is initiated either thermally or chemically in situ. The chain growth in the clay galleries triggers the clay exfoliation and hence the nanocomposite formation.

We have described several synthetic approaches, namely cationic ring opening polymerization, activated monomer polymerization, photoinitiated free radical polymerization and “click chemistry” allowing the preparation of polymer/clay nanocomposites.

 

CONJUGATED POLYMERS................top

There is a long interest to prepare soluble conjugated polymers so that polymerization, purification, characterization and processability to be carried out in solution, polymers to be free defects, with a known structure and to form thin films. Owing to their intrinsic chemical structure, conjugated polymers are insoluble in most organic solvents and improving their solubility and processability has been became an important objective that focused many research efforts. From the chemistry viewpoint this disadavantage could be surpassed by design of adequate monomers and introduction of solubilizing side chains onto the conjugated backbone is a very used and efficient method for solubility improving. However, the side substituents used until now are short alkyl chains or other functional substituents for introduction of other supplementary properties; liquid crystallinity, optical activity, ionic groups, etc.

The attaching of usual polymer short chains with a well defined length; i.e., polystyrene, polytetrahydrofuran, polylactone and poly-N-acetyl ethylenimine chains, onto polyphenylenenes and polythiophenes and properties of branched copolymers have reported.

Poly(p-phenylene) (PPP) is a typical conjugated, electroluminescent polymer for light emitting devices in combination with excellent mechanical properties and thermal and thermo oxidative stability. The key structural factor in describing the supramolecular ordering of PPP is their anisotropic shape, which follows from a rodlike architecture that differentiates them from flexible polymers. Unfortunately, PPPs are insoluble in many organic solvents, which limit their processability. Therefore, attachment of conformationally mobile alkyl side chains to the backbone has been important because it has allowed the controlled synthesis of soluble and processable PPPs with high molecular weight. In view of the expected large persistence length of the main chain and of the flexibility of the side chains, such molecules have been termed “hairy-rod” polymers. On combining a stiff, insoluble, rod-like polymer such as PPP with a soft coil, for example polystyrene, it is possible to form a new polymer with novel and interesting properties.
The design process, the essence of which is the chemical control of size and shape of PPPs, ultimately leads to conjugated polymers of varying, controlled dimensionality.
Our studies focused on the synthesis of PPP type graft copolymers that can present nanostructures between a conductive and an insulating polymer, by using the macromonomer technique via controlled polymerizations [ATRP or ROP (Ring Opening Polymerization)] as versatile “tools”, combined with metal-catalyzed Suzuki or Yamamoto polycondensation , specific to the obtainment of soluble, high molecular weight, conjugated polymers.
 

CLICK CHEMISTRY................top

‘‘Click chemistry’’ has recently been introduced as a new way of categorizing organic reactions that are highly efficient, modular and selective, and occur with simple work-up procedures. The 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azides to alkynes has become the most popular click reaction, and is widely used in biology, chemistry and material science. By using the efficient click reaction, different architectures of macromolecules such as dendrimers, dendronized linear polymers, hydrogels, supra-polymers and novel conjugated polymers can be created. Click chemistry strategy has also been implemented for the preparation of segmented copolymers of monomers polymerizable by different mechanisms.

 

BENZOXAZINE BASED THERMOSETS................top

Among various high performance materials, polybenzoxazine, as a recently developed thermosetting phenolic resin, has received much interest for its unique characteristics such as heat resistance, good flame retardance, low moisture absorption, good mechanical properties and excellent dimensional stability. Polybenzoxazines are obtained by ring opening polymerization of the corresponding monomers at elevated temperatures without catalysts and releasing by-products according to the following reaction.

They can also be polymerized by cationic initiators and onium salt photoinitiators. However, in these cases, the structures of the resulting polymers are complex and the properties are different than those prepared by thermal means in the absence of a catalyst. Therefore, the most of the studies on benzoxazines focused on their thermal polymerization.

Benzoxazine monomers as the polybenzoxazine precursors can be easily prepared from inexpensive raw materials like phenols, formaldehyde, and primary amines.

 This flexibility provides possibility of synthesizing a wide range of benzoxazine monomers with additional functionalities such as acetylene, nitrile, propargyl and maleimide groups. The incorporation of benzoxazine groups into polymers is an alternative way to further improve the properties. The benzoxazine groups act as thermal crooslinker and while the polymer may be accountable for the flexibility of these materials. Thus, thermally crosslinked non-brittle polybenzoxazine films can be prepared. In this paper, we describe our synthetic approaches proposed to prepare benzoxazine functional polymers. The incorporation of benzoxazine groups into polymers can proceed through two main synthetic routes (Figure 1);

  • ·       Performing polymerization of a particular monomer using a benzoxazine derivative possessing suitable initiating sites (functional initiator).

  • ·       Synthesizing benzoxazine ring structure by using a polymer with amino or phenol groups (monomer synthesis).

The shortcoming associated with the first route is the interaction of some propagating sites, i.e., cations with benzoxazine ring, particularly with nitrogen and oxygen heteroatoms. However, in some polymerization processes propagating species were unreactive towards benzoxazine and the ring structure was preserved during the polymerization. The second route is less sensitive to polymerization conditions but requires functional (mainly amino) polymers in advance. Classical monomer synthesis may successfully be followed with the available amino telechelics.

Coupling Processes